Monday, March 18, 2013

A Review of "Double Feature" [by Owen King]

Owen King's first novel, Double Feature, will be released this Tuesday (March 19).  Yours truly was lucky enough to win a copy -- a signed copy! -- from The Paranoid Style on Facebook, so unlike you plebians fine folk, I've already read it.

How did I manage this, you might ask?  Well, let's not get into it in excruciating detail; suffice it to say that I won a contest based on my love of the Christopher Cross song "Arthur's Theme (Best That You Can Do)," which is almost certainly the first time this millennium that loving that song has paid off for anyone.  Anyone, anywhere, in any way.  Trust me, I was just as surprised as you probably are; almost certainly not as disgusted, though.  In any case, it's lucky for me that I don't mind fessing up to a guilty pleasure every once in a while, because in this instance, it scored me a signed first edition of an outstanding new novel.   
 
Double Feature, unlike "Arthur's Theme," is not a guilty pleasure.  Instead, it's a pleasure that won't make you feel guilty at all, except, perhaps, guilty to be reading a better book than whatever your friends are reading currently; because odds are pretty decent that whatever they're reading, it won't be as good as Double Feature.






Here's the setup:

Sam Dolan is a college student who aspires to make a feature film.  Not just any old feature film, either; he aspires to make Who We Are, a cleverly-structured art film that aims to show the world "the hard reality of how quickly the days sped up, how suddenly you weren't a kid anymore."  Sam has written the screenplay and is ready to direct the film, provided he can get financing from somewhere.

Does he succeed?  Well, let's just say "yes," and leave it at that.  (The truth is more like "no," but the ways in which the answer is more a no than a yes are so catastrophically amusing that you will not catch me ruining the surprises for anyone.  You deserve to discover them for yourself, and to have the same experience I had: laughing so hard while reading in your bedroom at two o'clock in the morning that you become afraid you might wake your neighbors up and have the cops called on you, and end up in jail on charges of assaultive merriment.  Yes, it's true; I laughed so hard during certain scenes of this novel that I feared incarceration.)

Sam's struggles to film Who We Are are only a part of the story, though.  Sam is undeniably the main protagonist of the novel, but the most memorable character is probably Booth Dolan, Sam's father.  Booth is a washed-up actor/director who made a career out of starring in schlocky z-grade horror films.  The descriptions of these films are worth the cover price of Double Feature; I kid you not, if Owen King produced a monthly pamphlet in which he laid out the plots of half a dozen fake movies, I'd pay full price for it.  This stuff is gold.  I won't ruin them for you, although I'll give you one tantalizing nugget: Plato fighting werewolves.

A moment ago, I referred to Booth as "washed-up," but the fact is that he can't be washed-up, because he was never whatever the opposite of washed-up is to begin with.  He started out that way, so calling him washed up is technically not very accurate.  Whatever the status of his celebrity, Booth's numerous quirks have helped make life a challenge for Sam.  Booth is a hammy, larger-than-life man -- think Orson Welles by way of Edward D. Wood, Jr. -- whose exuberance and vitality seemingly have resulted in sending Sam in the opposite direction, toward dourness and gloom.  Sam wants to create art that reveals the realities of life; Booth once starred in a movie about killer rats in which real rats were filmed on dollhouse-size sets so that they would seem to be the size of monsters.  Naturally, there is a divide between their philosophies.

King creates an outstanding cast of characters.  Booth is the stand-out, but Sam himself is quirky enough to be way more than a delivery system for conflicts with Booth (which is what he would have been in the hands of many authors, I suspect).  In addition to Sam and Booth, here are a few of the other memorable folks you will encounter:

  • Brooks, a fellow student of Sam's who is one of the principal investors and who has aspirations to make his own movies
  • Polly, a former girlfriend of Sam's who is married, but not necessarily averse to still sleeping with Sam
  • Rick Savini, an indie-film actor (think Steve Buscemi) who gets roped into appearing in Who We Are
  • Allie, Sam's mother, who is amazingly tolerant of Booth's eccentricities
  • Jo-Jo, Polly's husband, a German who used to play -- not particularly well -- for the Yankees
  • Mina, Sam's half-sister, an adorably fucked-up teenager
  • Wesley, Sam's roommate, who has parlayed sloth into a successful career as a blogger
  • Tess, a television producer Sam meets at a wedding
  • Costas, a Greek immigrant who becomes an unlikely movie star

And, amazingly, others.  Virtually every character pops off the page; in this way, King is reminiscent of Larry McMurtry early in his fine career.  You'll notice that McMurtry has supplied a blub for the front cover of Double Feature, and that seems appropriate; King's facility for creating characters that leave room for both comedy and tragedy to come pouring out of them in utterly realistic ways reminds me more than a little of McMurtry books like All My Friends Are Going to Be Strangers, or Moving On, or Texasville.  The characters of those novels and of Double Feature are eccentrics and goofballs who occasionally feel as if they are too quirky to be realistic; in some ways they seem like caricatures moreso than characters.
 
IF, that is, you fail to remember that you yourself either know or have met or have heard described by someone real people who are infinitely weirder, with quirks that make the ones found between the pages of these books seem not only realistic, but comparatively tame.  I've been to Dragon*Con; I know what type of people are out there in the world, just waiting for some writer like King to immortalize their quirks in character form.

[By the way, speaking of Larry McMurtry, he is one of my very favorite writers.  In fact, I've got a blog devoted to his work.  You can check it out here, but be warned: there's not really much there.  It's less a blog than it is a placeholder for a blog to be blogged at a later date.]

Double Feature kinda blew me away, if you want to know the truth.  I could complain about a few things: the text has more typos than you typically find in a book from a major publisher; also, certain aspects of the final scene felt a bit too coincidental and tidy.  These complaints are minor enough so as to be mostly irrelevant; on the whole, this is a hilarious, engaging read, one that clearly marks King as a writer to be followed.

As I Tweeted not long after finishing: I could happily have kept reading about these people for another 1500 pages or so.

What more can you ask for from a novel than that, really?

15 comments:

  1. Very nice. Can't wait to read this one.

    I had no idea you were a McMurtry fan. I've only ever read The Last Picture Show, but that's a masterpiece. I've seen Lonesome Dove, of course, but never read it. One of these days.

    I see Sam Lipsyte provides a blurb on the back, too. That guy's short fiction is amazing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Lonesome Dove" is well worth reading. One of my five favorite novels, easily.

      Never heard of Sam Lipsyte outside of this blurb, but it sounds like I need to rectify that.

      Delete
  2. Now "this" hreview has just got me interested. I just wonder where I'm going to find time to get a copy (to be fair, I haven't even seen a copy of this on bookstore shevles).

    "The characters of those novels and of Double Feature are eccentrics and goofballs who occasionally feel as if they are too quirky to be realistic; in some ways they seem like caricatures moreso than characters."

    Maybe, but the truth is this sound more like a half-ways roman'e'clef, complete with all new invented lies to take you through the boring bits.

    "Plato fighting Werewolves". Let me just repeat for clarification sake, because there are obviously going to be some out there who will fail to grasp the fundamental levels of awesomeness of that concept.

    "Plato fighting -cking Werewolves".

    Okay, that's it, it's official, the writers of Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter owe it to the public good to pen "Plato's Republic (with Werewolves). It could start out with the basic text of Plato's Republic, only in the margins are jammed all these annotations mostly to do with the hassle of holding off a hoard of bloodthirsty lycanthropes outside your door, AND come to terms with the basic nature of the universe at the same time.

    Eventually, the margin notes disappear as Plato decides to incorporate the wolves into the philosophy text itself and thenjust get weirder and stranger with Greek gods, philosophical rivals, the possibility that ol' Plato might in fact be insane, the UFO who thought up the pyramids and pretended to be human until Charlton Heston showed up and then John Lennon appears on the scene, alive and well (okay, so sue me, I grasped at straws).

    ChrisC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As cool/lame as the mere idea of Plato fighting werewolves sounds, let me assure you, Owen King makes it sound even cooler/lamer.

      The book is out this week, so it ought to be relatively easy to find starting Tuesday. Drop back by and let me know how you like it!

      Delete
    2. As it turns out, the idea of cool/lame (one and the same) is something I'd heard of before.

      The first time it was ever exlained was from Noah Atwiler with this vlog:

      http://blip.tv/the-spoony-experiment/yor-hunter-from-the-future-movie-review-720x540-1621555

      While technically it has nothing to do with with Owen King, or his book, I can't help thinking of the character of Ste- the Dad and wondering if this might have been the type of film King had in mind when he was writing this character.

      ChrisC

      Delete
    3. I've actually seen "Yor, Hunter from the Future," believe it or not. Long ago on HBO. Terrible movie! If I recall correctly, it was an Italian-made film imported into the U.S., but otherwise, yes, I'd imagine it was precisely that sort of shlock that King had in mind.

      By the way, for the record... I didn't address this in my review, but it's worth pointing out that while the novel focuses on a father/son relationship in which the father is a schlocky horror icon, about the only thing that Booth Dolan and Stephen King have in common is that they are both tall. I say that having never met Stephen King, but I've seen enough of him in interviews to feel pretty solid about saying it.

      Delete
    4. Holy moley: YOR THE HUNTER FROM THE FUTURE!! One of the few films that made it to Rhein Main Air Force Base in the 80s... needless to say, my Dad thought I was insane for going to see it twice... then a third time... Haven't seen it since, nor thought about it in forever.

      Delete
    5. Even stranger: I had a conversation with a co-worker about that movie not more than maybe two weeks ago. She remembered seeing it at a theatre here in America!

      Must be something in the air...

      Delete
  3. Oh and as for this...

    "Jo-Jo, Polly's husband, a German who used to play -- not particularly well -- for the Yankees"

    grrrrrrrr.... I can only hope Owen sneaks in some Yankees burning-hate-and-boiling-blood for his fellow denizens of Red Sox Nation. If I ever discover his time in NYC has made him a Yankees fan, I'll lose some serious faith in my fellow man.

    Of course, if Jo-Jo is a delivery mechanism for said blood-and-rage, then faith renewed, and engage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, no, I think it's safe to say that King the younger is a Red Sox fan.

      Delete
  4. Hey Bryant! This is Lou from the Lilja & Lou Podcast. Dropping by to say hi and check out your review of Owen's book. I only skimmed, not having read the book yet, it as it goes into more detail than I want right now.

    I'll check back in once I've read it. Surprised to hear about the typos.

    Best wishes.

    Lou Sytsma aka @Olddarth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Howdy, Lou! You'll like the book, I imagine; it's a massive amount of fun.

      Delete
    2. Holy crap, it's YOU! Uh, well, first off thanks for dropping by, I guess, I'm a big fan of the podcast, and I hope to here many more.

      Checked out some of the blogs mentioned, the Grok sit looks good, but why such and empty writing journal?

      ChrisC

      Delete
  5. Good review, Bryant. I thought King's characters were the strongest point, too, and you're right, the ending was silly. Come to think of it, his dad's books are that way. King the Younger has talent, but I thought Double Feature was awfully long winded in getting from event to event. A serious editing would have done the book and King a good service. Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I definitely think King the younger needs a new editor, based on the frequency of typos, if nothing else.

      The ending of the novel has grown on me the more I've thought about it. I don't think it's as good an ending as the novel deserves, but at the same time, I have no clue what I would have done to end it differently.

      Thanks for reading!

      Delete